#Iphoto backups mac

From the iPhoto app itself, highlight the photos you'd like to copy, and then choose Share > Burn from the menu bar. If your iPhoto library is too large to fit on a disc, you could just burn parts of it. Then drag the icon toward the trash, which, when you start dragging the disc icon, morphs into a Burn Disc app. Insert a CD or a DVD and then drag your iPhoto library from your Pictures folder to the disc's icon on your desktop. Click Replace and you can sleep easy, knowing you have a recent backup of all of your photos.įor smaller iPhoto libraries, it's roughly the same process to back up to disc. If an older copy exists on the hard drive, you'll be asked if you want to replace it. Then, drag the iPhoto library file to your external hard drive's folder.

Then, open a new Finder window and open your Pictures folder, which contains a file called iPhoto library. A Finder window will open, showing its contents.

#Iphoto backups mac

Here's how in iPhoto '11:Ĭonnect your external hard drive to your Mac and open it. For the extra cautious, you can also save a copy of your iPhoto library to an external hard drive or a disc (because who knows-your Time Machine drive might fail one day). I trust that if you are a Mac user, you are performing regular Time Machine backups, which saves a snapshot of your entire hard drive and stores it on an external drive. In my mind unRAID is the value choice that doesn't compromise on data protection.Drag your iPhoto library file from your Pictures folder to an external hard drive to perform a backup.Ī computer crash can be devastating, especially when you lose all of your photos. I'd suggest your current unRAID server will not let you down for photos as well (assuming you're using a parity drive or two) as for your video streaming. So which is better? That surely is a question that each person must answer for themselves. unRAID uses separate data disks each having its own intact and mountable file system which can be used without unRAID if/as needed, thus minimizing data loss without getting wild with numerous Vdevs each having their own parity disk(s). FreeNAS can deliver more read and write throughput than unRAID because it uses multiple same-size disks together for read & write operations, as opposed to unRAID using one drive at a time.Įach drive in a FreeNAS Vdev generally is a member of a specialized pool of data, and none can stand on its own if something really goes awry. UnRAID requires only that your parity drive(s) be at least as large as your largest data drive, and all other data drives are whatever sizes you have available to use. To me it isn't worth the cost of higher CPU resources and requiring same size hard drives in each Vdev (array) to use FreeNAS over unRAID. ZFS (not just FreeNAS) offers features unRAID does not for data integrity and recovery, and unRAID offers some FreeNAS does not.

The server OS and configuration makes little difference in that case as far as best file protection goes.

If something fails, you fix it and copy over any lost data. You're planning on using your server as a backup, which means you have another copy of all your files elsewhere. UnRAID uses one or two parity drives just like FreeNAS and ZFS can.

I'm not sure there's any basis for complaint on the speed front since most photos are a few dozen MB at best.